ラベル photography の投稿を表示しています。 すべての投稿を表示
ラベル photography の投稿を表示しています。 すべての投稿を表示

9.4.09

Working on PR Photos...


Today I and Gonkar have done some photos taken for my new PR ideas...shooting in the street back of his studio building, with some of his art works. Wish if I had a professional camera but the outcome of the photography was great! It will reveal its appearance when I get some coverages on suitable publications...off we go!

Another Visitor to the Studio...


MJ Hobby-Limon from the TAG Fine Arts

I and Gonkar absolutely love this combination of smartly dressed Hobby and the East End London background.

Hobby is from the TAG Fine Arts, whose organization Gonkar works very close with.

Here is the information on the organization from the website;

TAG provides an outlet for working artists to exhibit and sell their work: acting as a support network for its stable, TAG offers advice regarding commissions within the trade; a hub, it proposes alternative exhibiting opportunities and a forum for broader critical discussion about contemporary art.

The selection criteria for artists wishing to join TAG is based on the proviso that they are working in a creative capacity in an alternative arts environment. TAG exhibits artists who take an integrated approach to their work crossing traditional boundaries and engaging with other creative disciplines, such as architecture, graphic design and fashion.

In this way, TAG promotes the vital role which contemporary visual art plays within today’s multi-disciplinary approach to the arts, and aims to foster new relationships and opportunities for its artists both in the UK and abroad.

As you can see, TAG is a very exciting and progressive art organization for artists to work with!

19.3.09

On Photography


MEMBER'S ROOM AT THE TATE MODERN. While the warm light of the Spring was shining thought the glass window, four writers (aka artists) got together to have a discussion on photography.

The meeting was on the next issue of Invisible Man Paper, edited by OKO GOTO and published by the photography gallery G/P in Tokyo. The discussion had mainly evolved around the idea of self-reflectivity, as one of the contributors PAUL O'KANE had recently been commissioned to write on the subject. The idea also fit nicely with the contributing photographer THIJS GROOT WASSINK's recent work "Don't Smile Now...Save it for Later!," where he takes a series of photographies by sitting inside of instant id photo machines with a mirror in his hands.

The issue consists of short texts on photography (Japanese/English) by four writers on one side, and a photo image by one photographer on the other side. Date of the release: TBA.

12.3.09

Upcoming Press Exposures...

This week at the Sweet Tea House, Gonkar had two photo shoots of himself for two upcoming press exposures; one for the N.Y. based Contemporary Visual Culture magazine Art Asia Pacific, and the other for the Tower Hamlet's local free newspaper East End Life. He will be featured as one of the hot topics in both of the publications, together with the news of attending Venice Biennale 2009. We are very happy that the news is going to be shared in the different levels and types of media - one in global & exclusice, and the other in local & inclusive.

4.3.09

a rose and bottle






"a rose and bottle in the ocean of bed duvet" (2009)

I've recently started making a series of photographies of roses.
I like them in the state of its buds,
I like them in the state of its zeniths, and
I like them in the state of its decay.
What I like about them the most is the smell I can be absorbed on my bedsheets.

14.11.08

チベット現代アート:新しいアイデンティティーに向けて


現代アートブームにより注目を集める中国現代アート。そして北京オリンピック開催に伴い浮き彫りにされてきたチベット問題。この二つの狭間に存在しつつも今も尚充分に認識を得ていないアイデンティティーがある-1966年の文化大革命の時期に生まれ、毛沢東政府による反ダライ・ラマ教育の元で育ったチベット民族第二生の存在だ。

ゴンカー・ギェイツォはそんなチベット民族第二生の一人で、北京で現代アートを学んで以来自身の「チベット」と「中国」という二つの混在するアイデンティティーを題材に、ロンドンにて作品を作り続けている。4枚のセルフポートレイト写真から成るシリーズ作品”Life”では、文化大革命前・後・インド亡命・ロンドン移住と、移り変わりながらも重なり合う異なる文化に身を置くアーティストの多面的人物像が提示されている。



この作品は、伝統的なチベット仏教アートであるタンカや仏像を現代アートの素材として使って来た事により、自らが民族として属するはずのインドで亡命中のチベットコミュニティーからは邪道として批判を受けた、「チベット人」「中国人」のどちらでもなく同時にそのどちらでもあるというアーティスト自身のアイデンティティーの葛藤の象徴であり、その存在の認識を求める叫びであるもと言えるだろう。今、存在するのに見られていないアイデンティティー=主体性が、複数の主体により単数の存在となるという新しいアイデンティティーの生産と認識への可能性を求めているのである。


(※この画像はアーティスト本人のホームページから非コマーシャル目的でリンクしているものであり、コピーライトはアーティスト本人に属する。)


Contemporary Tibetan Art; Towards the New Identity


Contemporary Chinese Art has been cerebrated in the midst of Contemporary Art boom. Political problem of Tibet has been brought into daylight accompanied by the opening of Beijing Olympic. In between these two, there is still an unknown identity that has been struggling into the light of recognition – it is the existence of the Tibetans who were born and taught under the Maoist Chinese government of post-1966 Cultural Revolution.

Gonkar Gyatso is one of these Tibetans; he has been making art works in London on the subject of his dual identity of “Tibet” and “China”, ever since he has learnt Contemporary Art in Beijing. The serial photography work “Life” consists of four self-portraits of the artist himself, each of which presenting him in different yet crossing over cultures – pre-Cultural Revolution, post-Cultural Revolution, exile in India, and immigration in London – representing the multiple-figure of the artist.




It could be argued that this work symbolises the identity dilemma of the artist, whose works were influenced by the traditional Tibetan Buddhist Arts yet criticised by the exile community of Tibet in India as being “improper” to the sacred art; i.e., being rejected from the community where his ethnic origin resides, the figure of the artist has been simultaneously split and integrated between “Tibetan” and “Chinese,” calling for the recognition of its unique existence. The unrecognised minority existence of an identity = subjectivity is demanding the possibility of creation and recognition of a new singular identity that consists of plural subjectivities.


(*The image has been retrieved from the artist's own web site for non-commercial purposes, and its copyright belongs to the artist himself.)


(*A modified version of this article has been published in "invisible man / paper" at G/P Gallery in Tokyo and Institute of Contemporary Art bookshop in London.)